Previous retail stocks within our Intrinsic Value Portfolio have fared poorly; whether we are talking about Lululemon or Nike, we haven’t had much success. But in my personal account, one retailer has done stellar: Aritzia. While Lululemon and Nike had strong arguments for their cheapness as investments, they lacked Aritzia’s abundant growth.
And while the market often pays up for growth, it sometimes doesn’t pay up enough, doubting the durability of a company’s growth. Especially in retail, the burden of proof remains continually quite high, because, well, we’re not the only ones who’ve been burned by retail.
If you thought we couldn’t find a business less widely understood by men than Lululemon, we’ll comfortably surpass that marker in exploring Aritzia today.
Sure, Aritzia doesn’t stamp its logo on all of its products, but I promise many women have no problem spotting the brand in the wild.
— Kyle
Aristotle Had An Inner Circle. Do You?

Members of our Inner Circle convene for Dinner in London
In 399 BC, Socrates was executed for “corrupting the youth” via publicly shared, raw truths.
Subsequent philosophers like Aristotle embraced more discreet relationships, inviting confidants to form an inner circle aimed at discussing life’s cosmic secrets.
While the stakes aren’t quite as high today, we steadfastly believe every investor deserves an inner circle, among whom they can delve into the deepest and most enriching conversations.
Push the boundaries of your knowledge and connections, and join The Investor’s Podcast’s Inner Circle — our most exclusive community of investors (and sometimes philosophers, too).
Aritzia: The Retail Brand Compounder Most Americans Have Never Heard Of

The Setup
I’ve owned Aritzia since 2020, and it’s still the largest position in my personal account. While it’s been a winner, it’s also come with its fair share of volatility. I’ve endured multiple drawdowns of 30-65%, despite the business compounding revenue annually at 24% and earnings per share at 30% in that time!
While growing quickly in the U.S., outside of major cities, you’ll seldom find Americans familiar with the brand. To people like Shawn and his wife, the brand is relatively “new.”
The stock is now roughly 6 times my average cost basis. And if I’m being honest, holding it has been an easy decision in hindsight and a hard one in real time. When I recorded my episode with Shawn on Aritzia, the stock was down 31% from its highs. The question I initially set out to answer was simple: was the market seeing weakness that I was blind to, or was this business just trading at a discount?
Then, after Shawn and I recorded the episode, Aritzia reported its fiscal second quarter, and the market answered that question for us, with shares climbing 22.5% the day earnings dropped. Whatever KPI you chose- revenue growth, comparable sales growth, US growth, or eCommerce- it exceeded expectations.
That changes the framing of the original thesis a bit. The business case has probably gotten a little stronger since we released the episode. My probability-weighted intrinsic value was about $148 a share, and the 23% discount I described is all but gone. So now the question becomes whether the business is good enough, and the runway long enough, to own at fair value.
What Aritzia Actually Is
Aritzia is a vertically integrated design house that sells its own brands, almost entirely to women, through its boutiques, website, and app. It calls its unique positioning in the fashion industry “Everyday Luxury”: well-made, well-designed clothes and accessories with high-touch service, priced so a typical professional can actually buy them.
To wrap your head around everyday luxury, it helps to define what it is not. It’s not Hermès or Louis Vuitton. Nobody buys a $10,000 jacket at Aritzia. But it’s also not H&M or Shein, where the garment looks fine when you first buy it, then falls apart after a few washes. A pair of Aritzia pants can easily run you $180. But the quality is high; my wife has a pair of leggings she’s owned for over 20 years that are still wearable!

Four Decisions That Built The Moat
Brian Hill, a third-generation retailer, founded Aritzia, but its roots trace back to Hill’s of Kerrisdale, a Vancouver department store. Back in 1984, a young Brian Hill started Aritzia in a corner of that store. Early on, it stuck to selling third-party brands. But over the next four decades, that business model shifted considerably.
There were four major decisions that have helped build Aritzia:
In-House Design: Talula Babaton, the first in-house label, arrived back in 1994 and still exists today as Babaton. Moving towards in-house design meant Aritzia never had to bet on someone else’s brand power. They took that power into their own hands, and their success or failure went from being external to internal.
Vertical Integration: Cutting out the middleman put margin back in Aritzia’s pocket, not the wholesaler's. Sure, this process involved other expenses, but it gave Aritzia much more control. When you are building a brand, this matters a lot. As Stig likes to say, “a brand is a promise,” and if you don’t keep your end of that promise to your customers, they will leave. And fast.
No Wholesale: Brian Hill decided early on that their apparel wouldn’t be available at Nordstrom or other department stores. This allows Aritzia to control its price, presentation, and discounting (which it rarely does). This is the first-party playbook Nike tried to adopt, but it hasn’t worked as well for them.
A House of Brands: Labels include Wilfred, Babaton, TNA, and Sunday Best; each targets a specific occasion. Those occasions include sweating out a gym spin class, working a corporate job, or going out on a night on the town with friends. With many brands, you’d need to visit separate stores, but Aritzia is a one-stop shop.

The Moat
When I’ve brought up Aritzia to the average investor, they always tell me the same thing: “retail is hard, and Aritzia at the end of the day doesn’t sell anything that I can’t find elsewhere.” And I don’t have a good argument against that, but remember I can also buy 100 different beverages, yet I keep going back to Coke (usually in the Diet or Zero variety). I do this because of Coke’s brand. That’s why Aritzia shoppers keep coming back, too.
What a competitor who pops up tomorrow can’t replicate is over four decades of trust that Aritzia has built. Customers know the fit, know the quality, and have a good idea of what wearing it signals to others. And that trust shows up in the numbers. Gross margin went from about 37% when it IPO’d in 2016 up to 49% today.
To me, this signals that people are willing to pay more for Aritzia’s goods. Arguably, the most impressive part of Aritzia’s margin expansion is how poor the environment has been as it scaled up. Tariffs and the end of the de minimis exemption (which allowed them to ship items under $800 to the U.S. with no customs fee) have been in place for the past few years, and they’ve still improved margins despite the headwind.
On top of that are the Aritzia Boutique economics. Aritzia reports generating roughly $1,000 in sales per square foot. The average, according to data from Tanger and Simon Property Group, is closer to $400 to $700.

What The Latest Quarter Told Us
Aritzia has an unusual fiscal year, with the latest quarter being Fiscal Q2 2027. And it was Aritzia’s best quarter ever. Part of the reason this quarter mattered so much is that many investors, I believe, had much lower expectations, as they presumably thought the US was headed for macroeconomic weakness. Instead of poorer results, they knocked it out of the park in every way imaginable.

All the margin and EBITDA figures also exclude a $97 million tariff refund, which greatly boosted their profitability numbers but isn't recurring. This is another reminder that headline numbers can often obscure the economic reality. So always remember to strip out one-time windfalls to avoid future errors. In Aritzia’s adjusted results, they removed it, which deserves credit.
Three areas of this earnings report really stood out to me.
First, US growth is re-accelerating. Last quarter, US revenue grew an outstanding 55%. But this quarter it grew 60%. The US growth story is really starting to take shape as they grew their US square footage by 20%, with double-digit comparable sales. Aritzia entered new cities in Birmingham, New Orleans, and St. Louis. Aritzia’s CFO, Todd Ingledew, said newer boutiques are generating higher sales per square foot than prior cohorts and are tracking to even faster payback periods.
Second is the growth in traffic. This means that Aritzia is generating more sales from adding customers, and not from price increases or from existing customers spending more at the stores. Markdowns also fell meaningfully, showing a strong inventory position and high demand. Growth driven by more customers showing up and paying full price is the highest-grade retail growth you can achieve.
Third is the improvement in margins. I already mentioned how gross margins have improved over the years, but over the past year they have been even more impressive. Aritzia had a 34% incremental EBITDA margin. I don’t expect growth like that to continue, but it’s a strong signal that Aritzia is managing costs well.
What Guidance Tells Us
As a result, management raised its full-year guidance from $4.78 to $4.88 billion in revenue, 29% to 32% growth, and an adjusted EBITDA margin of about 20%. That margin is about 1% above the long-range fiscal 2027 target set at the last Investor Day.
I have heard concerns about the second half. Q3 guidance is 23% to 27% growth, implying second-half growth rates in the high teens to low 20s. Aritzia is about to lap the October 2025 app launch, along with some exceptional growth years. So in the near term, they are getting investors to rein in expectations, which I’m fine with, because this isn’t a business that will keep growing revenue at 44% forever (nor can any business do that).
The Growth Engines
Aritzia has three growth engines they’ve relied on for the past few years. These are the same ones I think can keep Aritzia compounding for many years. What I like about Aritzia's growth setup is that it doesn’t require much innovation or risk; they just need to do what they’ve done historically, but at a larger scale.

The first part of that equation is in scaling the U.S. I discussed how well they have done in this when we looked at their latest quarter, but really the U.S. has been a key growth driver for multiple years:
Aritzia ended the quarter with 79 U.S. boutiques and has 82 today. Canada has about 67. The U.S. has roughly nine times Canada's population, and it generates about two-thirds of Aritzia's revenue. So even if you assume the U.S. never loves Aritzia as much as Canada, it should be able to support 5 times as many stores as Canada. This puts the total US opportunity in the 300-store range, nearly four times the current footprint.
While Aritzia could expedite store openings, I think their conservative approach of opening 12-14 per year is smart. This number has gradually increased. And you’d assume that if they are only opening this amount of stores each year, their revenue will stop growing as fast. But that hasn’t been the case simply because the US is still so underpenetrated.
This leads to the next growth driver: the digital space. This includes things like their app and eCommerce. The mobile app, launched a year ago, has already surpassed 2.5 million downloads. This has improved sales in native North American markets as well as internationally, where sales rose over 165% in the last year.

The third growth driver is brand awareness. This driver is the hardest to model but arguably the most important to Aritzia's growth story. In 2025, I spoke with an investor friend of mine and his wife, who spends time for work between Canada and New York. She felt that, outside New Yorkers who walk past the Fifth Avenue flagship every day, many American women had never heard of Aritzia.
That is the bull case in a single sentence: the brand converts people once they find it, and most of the U.S. hasn’t found it yet. Stores and digital also feed each other, too. There are still lineups around the corner when new boutiques open.
Capital Allocation and Returns
I’ve discussed a lot today how margins have continued to rise. The simplest answer is from decreasing input costs. Much of the initial markup gain comes from cost savings as volumes grow, plus optimizing product mix. You also get operating leverage on things like SG&A, plus the tailwind of the US mix shift.
Aritzia tends to price roughly in parity across the border. A Finch trench coat costs $298 in Canada, and $265 in the US. If you convert the US price to Canadian dollars, Americans are paying more for the same item, with the same input costs. As the US takes up more market share, margins should rise as well.

My return on invested capital calculation puts Aritzia at about 28%, and it's rising. You don’t need to be an MBA to see that’s an exceptional number and well above their cost of capital. And even if Aritzia doesn’t keep expanding that number, I think holding it steady is a win, as they can keep earning a high return while investing in more stores, distribution capacity, and digital infrastructure.
Aritzia is also a cash-generating business, with over $800 million of operating cash flow over the last year. To make their financials even better, they carry zero debt and currently have $528 million in cash on the balance sheet.
There is an update on the buybacks, which Aritzia has traditionally used to offset share-based compensation. Traditionally, they’ve increased shares outstanding by a 1% CAGR due to share-based compensation. But this calendar year, they reduced their share count by 1.5% by buying back 2.1 million shares. The stock price was down quite a bit earlier, and buybacks at those depressed levels should be value accretive.
Management And Alignment
Jennifer Wong, Aritzia’s CEO, started as a style advisor on the boutique floor in 1987 and became CEO in 2022. Few other CEOs have truly climbed from bottom to top as she has.
As CEO, she has retained roughly $500 million in earnings while the company's market value has risen by more than $10 billion, demonstrating her ability to create value.

Brian Hill & Jennifer Wong
Aritzia’s founder, Brian Hill, remains executive chair. He owns 15% of the company and still has voting control. He has done a great job aligning himself with shareholders by taking a $1 salary and a $1 bonus since the IPO — all he cares about is driving the stock higher over time.
But I had a few complaints. Outside of Brian Hill, insider ownership is thin. Wong owns much less than 1%. Incentive pay ties to revenue, EBITDA margin, and adjusted EBIT, all income-statement metrics. None of it rewards capital efficiency or cash flow generation. But with how good things are going today, it’s hard to complain too much.
The Risks
The first risk I’d highlight is in Aritzia’s brand. The brand has to constantly defend itself against competitors. J. Crew, Gap, American Apparel and Club Monaco once owned real estate in some of the best malls. But ask a 20-something today if they know those brands, and a shocking number will have no idea what you’re talking about. So if the brand were to weaken, and if shoppers no longer think it’s "cool,” then there is always the risk that customers spend their money elsewhere.
A bear would argue that, although Aritzia’s growth looks incredible right now, this is what a hot brand looks like before it cools down. High growth numbers can set up future quarters with an incredibly high bar. Management has already put the brakes on FY2027, setting expectations for a slowdown in the back half of the year. With Aritzia trading at 29x earnings, there isn’t quite as much room for disappointment.
Some other risks worth paying attention to:
Inventory levels. I’m fine with inventory rising as long as revenue rises in a similar range. Inventory ended Q2 at $715 million, up 36%. That is below Q2's 44% sales growth, but above Q3's 23% to 27% guide. Management says last year was under-inventoried. And I believe them for now, but I'll check this number in Q3 and Q4.
Expansion discipline. Openings are accelerating, albeit slowly. If sales per square foot fall or payback periods begin to stretch past 18 months, that would tell me the rollout is growing too fast.
Design misses. As the customer base becomes more American, Aritzia has to keep designing what Americans want. A bad season likely shows up as discounting and bloated inventory numbers.
Cyclicality. Apparel is, after all, discretionary. The U.S. consumer has held up so far, but a recession would test traffic-driven comps.
What’s it Worth?
I built my base case on a few simple assumptions. First, I modeled revenue growth at a 15% CAGR for the next five years. This is below the 20% growth rate Aritzia has posted since its IPO. Next, I assumed Aritzia continues to gain operating leverage, pushing margins to about 21%, which I consider conservative given the US's rapid growth. Lastly, I gave it an exit multiple of 15x EV/EBITDA, in line with Aritzia’s historical average, which I think is reasonable for a business still growing in the mid-teens in five years time.
That gave me a base-case value of $215 a share. Inputting my bear and bull case gets the intrinsic value to $148. To better gauge how the market viewed my growth assumptions, I ran a reverse discounted cash flow, which showed the market assuming a revenue growth rate of about 12%. I still think my number is sufficient and accounts for future slowdowns in revenue growth.
After the latest earnings release, the business went from being at a 23% discount to my intrinsic value to about 0%. While it’s great to see Aritzia’s financials validate the bull-case numbers, I don’t see any reason to change my modeling or assumptions. Thus, we chose not to add Aritzia to the Intrinsic Value Portfolio given our recent experience with retailers.
To listen to our full discussion of Aritzia, or for more company Deep Dives, check out our podcast here.
Updates on our Intrinsic Value Portfolio below 👇
Weekly Update: The Intrinsic Value Portfolio
To discuss stocks daily with Shawn, Kyle, Daniel, and all Intrinsic Value Mastermind Members, apply here.
Notes
Shawn and I (Daniel) hosted another Weekly YouTube Livestream on Friday, this time a portfolio update. It had been a while since the last one, and several positions were due for a rebalance. The episode covers our reasoning for each position in full. Here’s a quick overview of the changes:
Trimming:
Alphabet (14% → 10%): Alphabet has been a tremendous success for The Intrinsic Value Portfolio. We bought at an average cost of around $170 per share, and the stock has roughly doubled since. We believe the stock is now closer to fair value, and the challenges are different ones than 18 months ago. We’re taking the opportunity to bring the position back to 10%. At that level, it remains in our high-conviction basket (10%+ weight).
Airbnb (14% → 10%): Airbnb is another winner. The stock is up more than 30% year-to-date and more than 40% since we bought it. We remain bullish but wanted to take some chips off the table.
Adobe (7% → 5%): Adobe is the only trim driven by a change in our view of the business. Our doubts have grown over the past year, as each new AI development raises more questions about where Adobe’s business will be in the years ahead. That said, the underlying business is still performing well for now, and the stock trades at historically low valuations. So we’re reducing the position rather than exiting it.
Adding:
Uber (9% → 10%): Uber is the only company moving up into our highest-conviction basket. We believe it will remain the demand aggregator even as autonomous vehicles scale. We also think it will become ever more important in a society that increasingly wants to receive things, or get somewhere, now rather than later.
MercadoLibre (5% → 7%): MELI keeps executing exceptionally well, while the share price only modestly appreciated. So we still believe it’s undervalued and increase our stake to better reflect our conviction.
Intuit (3.5% → 5%): Intuit was previously a starter position. We’ve gained more conviction in the business’s resilience to AI, so it’s now a “full” 5% position.
CoStar (2% → 4%): Our confidence in CoStar has grown as well, though not yet to Intuit’s level. Management is still something of a question mark, which is why we’re stopping short of a full 5% position for now.
Nubank (2% → 4%): We want to limit our emerging-markets exposure, since MercadoLibre and dLocal already make up 9% of the portfolio combined. Still, Nubank has earned an upgrade. We consider 4% (at cost) the ceiling for this position. It’s a bank with consumer-lending risks similar to MercadoLibre’s, and we don’t want more exposure to that area.
Netflix (4.5% → 5%): Last but not least, Netflix has kept sliding and now trades slightly below our initial entry price. We used the weakness to top it up to a full 5% position.
Quote of the Day
"Your brand is not what you sell; it's the experience you deliver."
— Tony Hsieh
What Else We’re Into
📺 WATCH: Li Lu’s speech at Graham & Dodd Event
🎧 LISTEN: The Tycoons: Carnegie, Rockefeller, Gould & Morgan by David Senra
📖 READ: Inside Michael Mauboussin’s ROIC Framework by Invested Capital
You can also read our archive of past Intrinsic Value breakdowns, in case you’ve missed any, here — we’ve covered companies ranging from Alphabet to FICO, TransDigm, Perimeter Solutions, PayPal, DoorDash, Crocs, LVMH, Uber, and more!
Your Thoughts
Does Aritzia still have upside as a retailer?
See you next time!
Enjoy reading this newsletter? Forward it to a friend.
Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here.
Apply to join our Intrinsic Value Mastermind Community of investors.
Read our full archive of Intrinsic Value Breakdowns here.
Keep an eye on your inbox for our newsletters on Sundays. If you have any feedback for us, simply respond to this email or message [email protected].
What did you think of today's newsletter?
All the best,

© The Investor's Podcast Network content is for educational purposes only. The calculators, videos, recommendations, and general investment ideas are not to be actioned with real money. Contact a professional and certified financial advisor before making any financial decisions. No one at The Investor's Podcast Network are professional money managers or financial advisors. The Investor’s Podcast Network and parent companies that own The Investor’s Podcast Network are not responsible for financial decisions made from using the materials provided in this email or on the website.









